| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Jun 28, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Emmanuel wrote:
At 8:30 PM +0200 6/27/06, Wayne Melrose wrote:On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Emmanuel wrote:
At 10:54 -0700 27/06/06, Christopher Nebel wrote:I'd add the caveat that Intel Macs do not support Classic applications *at all*, so if you're still relying on some, then stay where you are.
Also, I think it's better to check that the Scripting Additions that your scripts use exist in Universal Binary.
so ahh.. where does Smile stand...? ;)
Smile 3.1 (currently 3.1.7) and its companion osax, Satimage.osax, XMLLib.osax, and Numerics.osax, work natively both on PPC and on Intel machines. They are Universal Binaries.
Slightly off-topic but not completely, our performance benchmarks often prove Smile and/or AppleScript faster or much faster on Intel than on PPC.
Emmanuel _______________________________________________
| References: | |
| >intel and Applescript (From: Robert Poland <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: intel and Applescript (From: Gary Tate <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: intel and Applescript (From: Christopher Nebel <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: intel and Applescript (From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: intel and Applescript (From: Wayne Melrose <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: intel and Applescript (From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.