On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Philip Aker <email@hidden> wrote:
> By your own admission you don't know the Carbon frameworks but more
> importantly, don't know the essence of Carbon, Therefore your can't offer a
> meaningful comparison between Carbon and Cocoa. I don't want to make you
> look like an ass. What I'd like you to realize is that Carbon is the deft
> intersection of "classic" Mac and Cocoa and in the process of the merge,
> manages to trim a lot of the warts out of both while preserving many
> valuable characteristics.
What is this, the Mailing List of the Easily Offended?
I didn't attempt to offer a meaningful comparison between Carbon and
Cocoa. I didn't offer ANY comparison between Carbon and Cocoa. All I
did was tell somebody who is afraid of the difficulty of moving to
Cocoa that it's more suited for his needs than he realizes.
In my mind, this does not deserve even one personal attack, much less
the two that I've so far received.
If you think that there was something wrong with my statement, please
debate it on the facts.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
