By your own admission you don't know the Carbon frameworks but more
importantly, don't know the essence of Carbon, Therefore your can't
offer a meaningful comparison between Carbon and Cocoa. I don't
want to make you look like an ass. What I'd like you to realize is
that Carbon is the deft intersection of "classic" Mac and Cocoa and
in the process of the merge, manages to trim a lot of the warts out
of both while preserving many valuable characteristics.
What is this, the Mailing List of the Easily Offended?
No. It's the list which notices consistent patterns in posted comments.
As previously cited from your own posts, your pattern is invariably to
claim Cocoa viability without the knowledge what it would be like to
do the same in Carbon or the knowledge of what it would be like to
port from an existing Carbon-compatible design. Furthermore, you then
consistently then superficially apologize and in due course, blithely
post again with the same recognizable pattern.
Philip Aker
echo email@hidden@nl | tr a-z@. p-za-o.@
Democracy: Two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
