On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Philip Aker <email@hidden> wrote:
> No. It's the list which notices consistent patterns in posted comments.
>
> As previously cited from your own posts, your pattern is invariably to claim
> Cocoa viability without the knowledge what it would be like to do the same
> in Carbon or the knowledge of what it would be like to port from an existing
> Carbon-compatible design. Furthermore, you then consistently then
> superficially apologize and in due course, blithely post again with the same
> recognizable pattern.
So your careful observations have led you to the conclusion that I am
well versed in Cocoa and not as well versed in Carbon. Brilliant! I
would have told you this directly if you had asked. I certainly don't
make any kind of secret of it as you imply. If you have any other
theories about my opinions and relative knowledge levels I encourage
you to simply ask me about them, and I will be happy to tell you.
Since I didn't offer a *relative* comparison of the two frameworks, I
have no idea why any of this matters. I only talked about the
suitability of Cocoa to a set of tasks. Logically speaking, only my
knowledge of Cocoa is relevant to this question.
Once again, if you disagree with what I said, please debate it based on facts.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
