I'm bummed that Carbon is going away, too, but considering how
Apple is killing off Carbon,
I like it better when you talk about solving Apple's 64-bit Carbon
problem. That is to say, being on the team that extolls the
benefits of Apple pursuing the Carbon counterpart to Cocoa rather
than one of the sheep.
baaaah? :-)
Or is it lemming? :-|
I'd like to point out that pursuing the Carbon/Cocoa merge/parallelism
is the mind stretch that Apple engineers need to keep up. If you only
develop one side of your brain and let the other atrophy, then an
imbalanced personality results. Similarly, I would not wish Mac OS X
to become a semi-witted Cocoa entity. In order to maintain OS
dynamism, a tension between the API sets must exist.
Philip Aker
echo email@hidden@nl | tr a-z@. p-za-o.@
Democracy: Two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
