On 10/1/05 1:25 AM, Patrick McClaughry didst favor us with:
> To tell the truth I do not know, but I'll try to find out and post
> what I find.
That would be great. Thanks. BTW, that was supposed to say "My application
lets people *set* the name-locked bit." There isn't any point in letting
them set an obsolete bit, hence my question.
FWIW, my vote is for the Finder to respect that bit. ;-)
Larry
> \pat
>
> On Sep 30, 2005, at 6:27 PM, Laurence Harris wrote:
>
>> On 9/30/05 1:15 PM, Patrick McClaughry didst favor us with:
>>
>>> That's a great question. From my reading of DesktopServices, no, the
>>> name-lock Finder flag is no longer consulted under X. Note that I
>>> didn't try this first hand yet though.
>>
>> The Finder ignores it. Is this a bug, another classic feature that's been
>> quietly dropped, or one of those "we haven't decided what to do about it"
>> issues? I'm not just asking out of curiosity. My application let's people
>> see the name-locked bit, but if it's been declared permanently
>> deprecated/obsolete I want to remove that from my application.
>>
>> Larry
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
