On Oct 3, 2005, at 6:16 PM, Christopher Linn wrote:
>On Oct 3, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Marc Poirier wrote:
>> Are the contents of UTImportedTypeDeclarations or
>> UTExportedTypeDeclarations in an Info.plist supposed to replace
>> CFBundleDocumentTypes declarations, or can they (or ought they)
>> coexist?
>
>A type declaration (UTExportedTypeDeclarations or
>UTImportedTypeDeclarations) is distinct from a document role claim
>(CFBundleDocumentTypes). They can and should coexist.
>
...
>
>As of 10.4, document role claims may reference document type
>information via a UTI instead of by listing extensions and OSTypes
>explicitly.
So which <key> do you use inside a CFBundleDocumentTypes array to make a claim via UTI? Is it LSItemContentTypes?
Also, if we want to support both MacOS X 10.3 and 10.4, should we keep the CFBundleTypeOSTypes and CFBundleTypeExtensions entries specified within the CFBundleDocumentTypes section of the plist also. Seems redundant since this info is in the UTExportedTypeDeclarations, but maybe it's necessary? Or is the claim using the UTI enough, even for 10.3?
Thanks,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
