on Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:09:00, Steve Baxter <email@hidden> wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2005, at 21:31, Laurence Harris wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/05 4:03 PM, Steve Baxter didst favor us with:
>>
>>> I would use FSRefs by value here rather than storing pointers, i.e.
>>> store the actual FSRefs in the vector rather than a pointer to a
>>> FSRef. The overhead of copying 80 bytes will be so small as to be
>>> unmeasureable. You may actually find that the copy overhead is less
>>> than the malloc() overhead of allocating 80 bytes (but only Shark
>>> will tell you).
>>>
>>
>> Except it's not either/or. If you store pointers, such as is the
>> case with a
>> CF widget or a vector of FSRef pointers, once you allocate the
>> memory for 80
>> bytes, you still have to copy the FSRef into the allocated memory.
>
> True, true.
Or FSGetCatalogInfo[Bulk] could do this copy itself.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden