Re: CG vs QuickDraw

• Subject: Re: CG vs QuickDraw
• From: mark <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:37:31 +1200
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

On 2007-06-10, at 16:23:21, Anders Markussen wrote:

If you want the 1-pixel-wide line to not span several pixels, you simply add 0.5, so CGContextMoveToPoint(ctx, 10.5, 4); CGContextAddLineToPoint(ctx, 10.5, 24);

I know about the 1/2 pixel trick. It's a design bug that we have to do stuff like that in the first place.

I actually prefer this to the QD way. Fewer stroking rules to remember = better, even if it is a bit weird at first to those of us who got used to QD.

I love CG.

I must admit, I do too. It would have taken me years to get a PDF out of QD.

Cheers,

I'm curious. Is QD implemented on top of CG or is it seperate?

Mark
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CG vs QuickDraw
    • From: David Duncan <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: CG vs QuickDraw
• Next by Date: Re: CG vs QuickDraw
• Previous by thread: Re: CG vs QuickDraw
• Next by thread: Re: CG vs QuickDraw
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread