On Friday, June 15, 2007, at 09:07AM, "Tony Scaminaci" <email@hidden> wrote:
> I think Carbon was originally intended to be a transitional API to
> ease the fears of developers in OS 9.
I don't know how originally that was, but given the HIToolbox and Carbon has been evolved quite a bit beyond Mac OS 9 and the various announcements and assertions on stages, even from Steve himself, I don't see Carbon as a "transitional API".
I have another theory here... is Apple Management testing the Carbon water and see how many are drinking it?
I can't see how they would make an announcement (64-bit Carbon) on stage then a year later decided to drop it? Is it really technically impossible or demanding?
>From what I read, almost all the cross-platform work out there are Carbon based. I work on two plugins that are Carbon based... a lot of the big app's out there are Carbon based...
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
