Thread-topic: Data Browser Item Notification Question
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209
> From: John Stiles <email@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:41:34 -0700
> To: David Landon <email@hidden>
> Cc: <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Data Browser Item Notification Question
>
> The discrepancy you've noticed may be because UPPs used to be
> required for older CFM apps, but in Mach-O they are no longer used.
>
Hmmm... I see in the debugger that the NewUPP functions simply return the
function address. So do we still need to (or should we) call all those
NewUPP and DisposeUPP functions? Or can we just pass the function addresses
now?
Apparently things have changed a bit while I was off in Windows/Linux
land...
>
> On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:33 PM, David Landon wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> The headers claim you can "freely" pass a function matching the
>> DataBrowserItemNotificationWithItemProc prototype to
>> NewDataBrowserItemNotificationUPP.
>>
>> That begs the question of what is the purpose of the two API calls:
>> DisposeDataBrowserItemNotificationWithItemUPP
>> NewDataBrowserItemNotificationWithItemUPP
>>
>> Which set of calls should I be using? A bit confusing...
>>
>> The goal is to attempt to get the double-clicked column from the
>> fourth
>> parameter to the DataBrowserItemNotificationWithItemProc callback.
>>
>> --
>> David Landon
>> email@hidden
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/jstiles%
>> 40blizzard.com
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
