I think Apple is making mistake by not featuring any development in
Carbon. If developer wants to develop application for multiple
platform, he has to use Carbon & I think apple does not want to allow
other programmer to develop application for any other platform.
Carbon
is truly a great language which does not bind itself to any language
strictly while cocoa extensively binds itself to obj-c.
I don't think it's really ever been a secret that Carbon was
intended primarily as a bridge for OS9 apps to port to OS10.
That is absurd and inflammatory. It is revisionist history in every
sense of the term.
I think John Nack of Adobe explains it better than I - as he would say
- Cocoa is not the One True Way™.
That was a number of years ago. I'm not incredibly surprised if
Apple feels that Carbon's outlived its usefulness.
Nope that is not the reason they gave us at WWDC - for what it's worth.
Really, objective C isn't that hard to learn.
Non sequitur. Neither is Portuguese.
Thanks to all of you for proving my point. I knew you would come
through.
More later,
Jack
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Carbon-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/carbon-dev/email@hidden
