thanks for your quick answer. i thought i'd have to do
that - i was just surprised that the universal 10.4SDK
supplied with the Xcode tools does contain non-fat libs.
would it be impudent to ask how much sense it makes to
call it _universal_ SDK then?
From my response:
(The library in question was not from Apple, btw. The alternative
is
to use the various APIs on the system that deal with JPEGs.)
You have a flat version of the library installed in /usr/local/lib.
It was not supplied with the SDK nor installed by Apple. The SDK
contains a symlink from |SDKROOT|/usr/local/lib to /usr/local/lib.
Generally, stuff installed in /usr/local/lib -- mostly from random
open source libraries -- is not platform specific and, thus, the
symlink makes sense. Kind of.
