I am not sure if they have changed the trays, but the last one I set up
with a CGS RIP the adjustable guide had to be in a standard position (
IE: 11x17, 8.5x11 etc) in order for the paper to feed. This may have
been an issue with CGS, but I never got a chance to drive it directly
from OSX to find out as the Canon driver was very flaky.
Have you been successful in using a non standard size? Other than that
I was very impressed with the Quality and speed and the ability to have
two paper trays.
Have a good weekend.
Troy
On Jan 21, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Richard Kenward wrote:
In his posting of Fri, 21 Jan 2005, writes Troy Buccini
I have both printers and without a doubt the 4000 feeds better. I have
used mine to build media sample books and registration is great on the
1000's of sheets on 40+ stocks that I have run through it...
Especially
on the 13x19 and 17x22 sheets. I can honestly attribute the great
registration to the fact that the 4000 has an adjustable paper tray
that helps prevent skewed feeds. This is unlike the Canon 2200 that
only holds certain sizes.
Dear Troy
I hope you don't mind my picking you up on your statement above
regarding the Canon 2200. I imagine you are meaning the W2200 proofer
model. We have one of these excellent printers and the standard
paper tray holds paper up to A3plus, and you can indeed set the
adjustable guides to any in between size you want. There are also
notches that the guides click into for the recognised paper sizes. I
am in the UK so perhaps there is a difference between countries.
Cheers
Richard
--
Richard Kenward Join the Pro. only list at: www.Pro-imaging.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/
email@hidden
