In a message dated 12/2/07 10:41 AM, Klaus Karcher wrote:
>> Klaus Karcher wrote:
>>> I's somewhat misleading to use a instrument to verify it's own results:
>
> Marco Ugolini wrote:
>> Not if one's purpose is to verify the *internal consistency* of a monitor
>> profile
>
> Agreed. It's not misleading to perform internal consistency checks, but
> it's definitely misleading to "sell" the results as a sufficient quality
> criterion for softproofing applications.
Yes, that is true.
I think that certain, shall we call them, "interested parties" are artfully
vague regarding the verification procedure, and do not seem to mind too much
if the user gets the impression (or don't do much to dispel such an
impression) that it's an *absolute accuracy* check, rather than an *internal
consistency check* -- which is far more limited in scope and validity than
an absolute accuracy check.
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
