Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94

• Subject: Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
• From: Henk Gianotten <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:38:00 +0100
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

That's interesting Martin.
(snip)

> AdobeRGB hasn't a big enough gamut to handle 100% cyan used on sheet
> fed litho.

ProPhoto then? Or why bother in the first place? Suppose one just do CMYK
soft proofing. Take the majority of monitors on the market, let's throw in
the CG221 in the mix. Then why bother with AdobeRGB alltogether since the
U-DACT will show huge DeltaEs (17 for the i1 and 11 for the Optix your
reports show) for the 100% cyan anyway? We could do away with sRGB-type of
gamuts monitor and go on with life as not even the supposedly wide gamut
beasts are not even capable of showing us 100% Cyan under 17 or 11 deltaE.

Roger,
ECI-RGB-v1 and v2 will do it.
The values for cyan (ISO 12647-2:2004 A: 2007) will fit.
In ECI rgb it's 21, 127 and 204.
One of the reasons to use eciRGB. The other one for v2
is the linear behavior.
Regards, Henk Gianotten

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
    • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: U-DACT tests for informal comparison (Adobe RGB gamut?)
• Next by Date: Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
• Previous by thread: Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
• Next by thread: Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread