User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Roger Breton wrote:
I'll bet both instruments have had independent matrix correction factors
into them that yield the same results. But who would have thought that
Samsung would have favored one brand of instrument for the European market
yet another for North America. I fail to see the marketing logic behind this
one.
The most unsurprising reason would simply be cost. If the US
market is perceived to be less caring about color, and
more sensitive to price, this may be reason enough.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
