> > The v4 ICC spec improves this situation by specifying the
> source gamut
> > explicity.
>
> How? Care to quote the relevant part of the spec?
I was restating Harold's comment that it now includes an explicit Reference Medium Gamut, although I haven't read the spec...
> The only thing that comes close to this today, commercially,
> that I know of,
> is Fuji C-Fit. Along with offering support for the regular ICC
> RI it offers
> is own flavors of Perc and Col RIs such that it calculates the
> gamut mapping
> dynamically for every image that comes along extracting the data
> out of the
> chosen Source and Destination profiles. Plus it incorporates a
> number of
> advanced proprietary color tweaks that result in very different
> kinds of
> separations, with loads of local perceptual and colorimetric and
> saturationoptimizations for memory colors and lightness mapping.
> I hope to post some
> sample images on my web site soon...
Fuji C-fit looks very interesting. It looks like to me that by incorporating these colour "tweaks" they are attempting to build a system whose colour matching objective is "preferred" reproduction instead of a colorimetric match. I can see this being useful for a lot of consumer applications, where the image capture might not be the best quality, and the desire is simply for a pleasing result. But do you see it being appropriate in a professional setting, for the more sophisticated user?
I'd love to see those sample images.
Matthew Larmour
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
