I just got one of the smaller iSis unit and was a bit baffled by the way it
operates. I thought it was a bit slow. The business about reading each row
twice cannot be disabled (with or without UV, in both ColorPort and
MeasureTool -- I think it's in the driver).
For profiling and calibrating inkjet printers, I think it is fine. It's a
bit trying about exact target width, though.
As for feeding thin paper, like 40lb coated paper, I find it can easily
misfeeds (a little frustrating).
For sheetfeds press profiling, it's OK. But no so for webs. I find the
"native" iSis target sizes a little on the oversize as compared with IT8.7/4
formatted for the DTP-70 and the Spectroscan.
I'm aware that there are versions of the IT8.7/4 Random target that can be
either read with the DTP-70 and iSis but, so far, I have not been successul
in reading those with the smaller iSis I have, either out of ColorPort or
MeasureTool.
So, for my purpose, it's equivocal.
> Just got my hands on an production iSis (previous experience was with an
> early beta build). I¹m wondering what the consensus is for doing a dual
> measurement (UV and NonUV) for the slew of fine art papers. Its half the
> speed which isn¹t a big deal. Does this bring anything to the party? Since
> the LED has no UV component, the normal reading is like the UV cut on an
> EyeOne. The default in ProfileMaker Pro appears to be set to ³No² and I
> think I¹m getting two measurements per row. Worthwhile?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew Rodney
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
