Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R G B 8bit: how much better is it

• Subject: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R G B 8bit: how much better is it
• From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:34:08 +1000
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070509 SeaMonkey/1.1.2

Bob Frost wrote:

So I think there is more similarity between the complete camera system and the complete human system than you imply, and that the basic sensors operate on the same linear principle. The non-linearity in both systems is introduced later during processing.

Well it may all come down to semantics, but my impression is that a
lot of the human eye non-linearity is right in the sensor. The term
"cone bleaching" is the key.

Graeme Gill.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Re: CMYK profiles... CS2 vs. CS3
• Next by Date: Re: X-Rite iSis and dual measurements
• Previous by thread: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R G B 8bit: how much better is it
• Next by thread: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread