Mike,
Terry is right, this business of differences among instruments almost
defeats the conscientious efforts and care that go into color management in
the first place. In my own practice, I always have to be on the lookout for
those places where I get caught between inter-instrument (SpectroEye vs
Spectroscan vs iCcolor vs EyeOne) or, more aptly, inter-manufacturers
differences (SpectroEye vs 530 vs DTP70 vs Techkon). That's not easy to sort
but it's a reality nevertheless.
Terry, I wasn't aware that NetProfiler was only correcting for agreement
with the 'master' instrument of each kind? That is not how I was introduced
to the service by GretagMacbeth at the time.
[ snip ]
> Perhaps this can be approached empirically: Can
> anyone demonstrate a noticeable and objectionable variability in
> printed color that can be traced to the performance of any recent
> model of spectrophotometer that has passed its manufacturer's
> certification process? This is the key: With all of the variables in
> play, some with high degrees of randomness, you need to establish
> that the instrument was a problem before accusing manufacturers of
> indifference to quality.
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
