Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Accuracy of instruments


But with all due respect, that's a rhetorical answer, not a scientific one. More accurate always sounds better, of course, and we should want instruments that are a bit better than what we need. But how good is that, exactly, when we consider the entire color reproduction process? Are additional improvements in our instruments needed, and how possible (and costly) are they? Other industries answer these questions fro themselves; shouldn't we? I think it's healthy now and again to question our own premises...

Perhaps at this point we could hear again from the manufacturers?

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:39:26 -0700
From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
Subject: RE: Accuracy of instruments
To: "colorsync user" <email@hidden>
Message-ID: <p0624083ac3511119a15a@[216.254.4.110]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 12:13 PM -0400 11/2/07, Mike Eddington wrote:

And I feel the argument that variability
existing in lighting conditions and the human visual system just makes
me want more confidence in my spectro, not less. 


I think this might just be the quote of the week.

Thanks Mike.

Regards,

Steve


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden


Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.