Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CIEDE2000 and CIELUV versus CIELAB



> (Measure two colours and calculate dE according to dE(uv), dE(1994) and
> dE(2000) and you'll get three different answers.  Which measurement is
> considered the best estimate/representation of typically perceived
> difference?)
> 
> Steve

CIE Luv is a linear transformation of XYZ. As such, it does not have the
cube-root compression that CIELab has. Plus, it does not have at its root
the Munsell color system. So, perceptually, it is not better to describe
color differences than, say, CIE xy. dE94 and dE2000 are both 'weigthed'
color differences metrics. Heavily empirical. dE94 has its followers in the
automotive paint industry. dE2000 is the latest fad (don't mean that
derogatively). Keep in mind that many 'standards' and specifications are
still written with dEab -- even in 2008.

Roger Breton 


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: CIEDE2000 and CIELUV versus CIELAB (From: Steve Kale <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.