| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Steve, The following reference:, http://www.iscc.org/jubilee2006/abstracts/LuoAbstract.pdf, gives a historical perspective in the color difference formulas. In this paper, it's clear that CIELUV stopped and new formulas based on CIELAB were developed, like CIEDE2000 and others. I believe CIELUV is rarely used nowadays.
Best regards, Lorenzo
Thanks Lorenzo.
Ok so I'm way behind the curve! I've just not seen CIECAM02 deployed in any of the tools I use, eg Photoshop.
Perhaps I should rephrase my question. I understand that one can calculate colour differences using a "delta-UV" equation and the LUV space. Is it considered more accurate to measure colour differences using LAB-based calculations such as dE(1994) or the "improved" dE(2000) (which I understand only apply to the LAB space) than computing colour differences in the LUV space with LUV-based formulae? By "more accurate" I mean that the numbers calculated represent better estimates of perceived differences (with 1 unit of delta, however calculated, being the theoretical minimum perceivable difference for normal human vision).
(Measure two colours and calculate dE according to dE(uv), dE(1994) and dE(2000) and you'll get three different answers. Which measurement is considered the best estimate/representation of typically perceived difference?)
Regards
Steve
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Re: CIEDE2000 and CIELUV versus CIELAB (From: Steve Kale <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.