I never had any issues in this respect with several EIZO CG's and
the eye-one pro.
Well, as I mentioned, my evidence was only anecdotal as I haven't had
time to dump the numbers and compare them.
I notice it visually when using Gretag's own display calibration
software - the 3/4 tones just look mushy.
And if I use Quato's iColor software on dumb LCDs like the Apple
Displays and then do an UGRA test they usually perform badly on gray
balance in the two shadow values immediately above black.
Switch to a DTP94 and the problem goes away.
I read Derrick's comments on heat/noise with great interest. We have
other people on the list who have experience of turning the output of
the EyeOne Pro into monitor profiles - are they having to compensate
or interpolate to get the EyeOne to deliver useful data from depths of
the monitor gamut?
