On Aug 9, 2005, at 10:13 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
This code looks intuitively correct, so it *should* be OK, in
general sense. A closely related issue in the C++ standard is
described here: <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-
active.html#463> (may even be exactly the same, I'm not sure). When
corrections to the standard introduce such severe regressions, I
don't know who is to blame.
This looks like the exact same issue. I guess I'm not the first to
encounter it. =)
CodeWarrior compiles this just fine (why am I not surprised?),
but still doesn't compile other intuitively correct code (grrrr...):
I haven't used CodeWarrior in years so I can't really comment on it.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
