Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: APSL 2.0 vs. APSL 1.x



On Feb 8, 2005, at 12:05 PM, David N. Williams wrote:

Am I correct that APSL 2.0 can indeed be used with complex.c?

Hi David,

While only your lawyer can give you a definitive answer, in principle any code covered by the APSL 1.1 may be redistributed under the terms of the APSL 2.0.

The comments at the top of the complex.c file are a "license header" which are not the full license, but contain a reference to it. The relevant section of the APSL 1.1 states[1]:

7. Versions of the License. Apple may publish revised and/or new
versions of this License from time to time. Each version will be given
a distinguishing version number. Once Original Code has been published
under a particular version of this License, You may continue to use it
under the terms of that version. You may also choose to use such
Original Code under the terms of any subsequent version of this
License published by Apple. No one other than Apple has the right to
modify the terms applicable to Covered Code created under this
License.

Hope this helps,

- Kevin

[1] <http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.1.txt>

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >APSL 2.0 vs. APSL 1.x (From: "David N. Williams" <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.