[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Relative setting of RPATH/RUNPATH to overcome need for LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Subject: Re: Relative setting of RPATH/RUNPATH to overcome need for LD_LIBRARY_PATH
From: almisr <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 18:07:59 +0200
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden

http://plumber.gnu-darwin.org/shared.php?_w2pb=pub/projects/rtool-12

http://plumber.gnu-darwin.org/shared.php?_w2pb=pub/projects/rtool-12/ samples/relative_path

Best Regards, {The Unnamable}

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>Relative setting of RPATH/RUNPATH to overcome need for LD_LIBRARY_PATH (From: email@hidden)
	>Re: Relative setting of RPATH/RUNPATH to overcome need for LD_LIBRARY_PATH (From: "Peter O'Gorman" <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Relative setting of RPATH/RUNPATH to overcome need for LD_LIBRARY_PATH (From: email@hidden)

Prev by Date: Should getWorkLoop be thread-safe?
Next by Date: Problems with open() and close()
Previous by thread: Re: Relative setting of RPATH/RUNPATH to overcome need for LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Next by thread: Should getWorkLoop be thread-safe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home