Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
Re: Intel XNU bug report
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intel XNU bug report



On 9 Aug 2006, at 12:53, Chad Leigh wrote:


On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Eric Albert wrote:

On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:55 PM, almisr wrote:

Mike has implemented ACPI 2 standard in IA-64 for Darwin,

By the way, IA-64 is the name Intel uses for Itanium, which Darwin does not support. We've been using "Intel 64-bit" or "x86-64" for our latest architecture.

Sun I think uses x64 which is kind of a nice shorthand for x86-64. A lot of people like FreeBSD use amd64 since AMD fathered the particular 64bit architecture which intel copied.


Would be nice if Darwin/Apple etc used a name that is already in use by others so a to not offer more confusion.


how about EM64T, or "washing machine controller chip with a few extensions"? Seriously, AMD invented this stuff and they call it x86-64, so I think that's a reasonable decision and already in use. i38664 would have been wrong. NetBSD, RedHat/Fedora/Centos use x86_64.


But IA-64 is Itanium in most people's mind, that I agree with.

IA-32-64 would be appropriately unconfusifying, then ;-)

--
Graham Lee
"Oxford University's UNIX Expert"
Quick, run before they find the truth
http://iamleeg.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Intel XNU bug report (From: almisr <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Intel XNU bug report (From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Intel XNU bug report (From: Chad Leigh <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2011 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.