Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?

• Subject: Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?
• From: Jeffrey Johnson <email@hidden>
• Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:39:50 -0800
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

Hello,

 Now that the use of task_for_pid() on intel boxes has been tightened to use by root or processes belonging to procmod:
 <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/universal_binary/index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40002217>

those of us relying on the helpful snippet in TN2050 have been chopped off at the knees. Does anyone have a workaround for getting notified when a process terminates without resorting to polling? (I only care about processes owned by my UID.)


Thanks
Jeffrey Johnson
Macintosh Development
Wavefunction, Inc.
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?
    • From: "Timothy J. Wood" <email@hidden>
  • Re: Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?
    • From: Dave Zarzycki <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: Protected Memory
• Next by Date: Re: Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?
• Previous by thread: Re: Using too much memory crashes entire machine
• Next by thread: Re: Alternative "dead port listener" implementations under intel?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread