What would be interesting to see in the Intel source version is the
explanation why one week before the announcement of Mac OS X for Intel
at WWDC, the x86 version of Darwin was said to be a dying 3-leg horse
from a performance point of view with no hope of recovery and now, since
the release of the Intel iMac Core Duo, it is (or stated to be) a stalion.
This could help me for turf related stuff :)
I think (or at least, it appears to be) because "Darwin/x86" and "Darwin
on OS X for Intel" are probably different beasties. I'm surprised
there's not been more activity over on darwin-x86@ actually...