Re: usefulness of source

Subject: Re: usefulness of source

From: Garth Cummings <email@hidden>

Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:17:12 -0800

Delivered-to: email@hidden

Hi Chris,

On Feb 23, 2006, at 7:42 PM, Chris Thomas wrote:

Especially because kernel documentation is nonexistent, the source is necessary for driver development.

I'm particularly interested in specifics when a developer writes something like this. "Nonexistent" isn't literally true as any search of <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicedrivers> will show. So I interpret your statement to mean that you couldn't find information on something you're specifically interested in.

I work closely with the tech writers who produce the I/O Kit docs and I know they're perfectly willing to improve the situation if they know where the holes are.

Can you refer me to some bug numbers you've filed on the documentation so I can see what state they're in?

Thanks,

--gc

____________________________________________________________________

Garth Cummings email@hidden

Sr. Software Engineer

Apple Developer Technical Support

http://developer.apple.com/technicalsupport

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:

Re: usefulness of source
- From: Chris Thomas <email@hidden>

References:

>usefulness of source (From: Rob Braun <email@hidden>)

>Re: usefulness of source (From: Amanda Walker <email@hidden>)

>Re: usefulness of source (From: Chris Thomas <email@hidden>)