Re: gcc linking question

• Subject: Re: gcc linking question
• From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>
• Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:26:59 -0700
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

On Nov 3, 2007, at 10:03 AM, mothra wrote:

Excellent. Apple is not a rogue entity, my code is now more compliant,
*and* I now understand how the compiler was handling my old code. Thanks
so much for the help!

If a static data member is of const integral or const enumeration type, its declaration in the class definition can specify a constant- initializer which shall be an integral constant expression within its scope. The member shall still be defined in a namespace scope if it is used in the program and the namespace scope definition shall not contain an initializer.

So in your example, this should be fine:

// Merp.h
class Merp
{
	// ...
	static const double Thing = 1.0;
};

// Merp.cc
const double Merp::Thing;

That's probably more akin to what you want.

--
Steve Checkoway

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

• Prev by Date: Re: gcc linking question
• Next by Date: fcntl questions
• Previous by thread: Re: gcc linking question
• Next by thread: fcntl questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread