[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle

Subject: Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle
From: Alain Frisch <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:45:01 +0100
Delivered-to: email@hidden
Delivered-to: email@hidden
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Alain Frisch wrote:

I also tried with "-read_only_relocs suppress". It works under 10.4, but not 10.5. Is it still possible to link bundles with relocations in text sections?

Replying to myself again (sorry for the traffic): it seems ld_classic does what I want with "-fread-only-relocs suppress". Is the fact that the new ld does not support this option an indication that it will become unavailable soon?

-- Alain

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-x86 mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/darwin-x86/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle
  - From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>

References:
	>Linking non PIC code in a bundle (From: Alain Frisch <email@hidden>)
	>Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle (From: Alain Frisch <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle
Next by Date: Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle
Previous by thread: Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle
Next by thread: Re: Linking non PIC code in a bundle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home