Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security

• Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
• From: Joel Esler <email@hidden>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:03:31 -0400
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=nUtk0ejcCSdoWxAhiashd2ZQ07gfBUz4dEtVR8GJLBB6TGnmB2W0qDWKZG3+DuegIT6ElGodn2sd2DF+xpogXgrozDYKdl5FSopvW0fUG9/p+w3ek7B8Q5lqsZtbsHyhqoY/3mBVpXBAZ4ArYHMHWT5Eh4DEp8aSwAL7c6ASFnY=

But what makes us think that a chip is going to protect the machine?

More money wasted.

J

On Jul 27, 2006, at 5:17 PM, George Polich wrote:

I do not know much about the hardware of Apple other than the basic memory,
drives, and plug sockets.

Does Apple have this module? Or is this the death knell of Apple in Army
systems?

~~
George Polich
Army Public Affairs Center, HQDA

------ Forwarded Message
From: FCW Daily News <email@hidden>
************************************************************
NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
************************************************************

Army to require built-in security
Netcom plans to require all new computers to include a hardware-based
security technology called the Trusted Platform Module.
http://newsletters.101com.com/c.asp?id=621816&l=2&c=859a54d65bafcbe5

------ End of Forwarded Message

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/fed-talk/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

Joel Esler

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/fed-talk/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
    • From: Amanda Walker <email@hidden>
  • Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
    • From: "Timothy J. Miller" <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
• Next by Date: Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
• Next by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] FW: Army to require built-in security
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread