Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Java 1.3: 10.1 vs. Jaguar

I'm developing a scientic GUI that currently assumes Java 1.3.
I'm doing the development on a Mac (G4, 10.1.5) but with the idea
that the application also works on Windows and Linux. I have avoided
using any native interfaces; the hope is that the code will be totally
portable. I obviously do all kinds
of other stuff on my Mac, but the development work is a high priority.

My question is: is there any good reason, Java-wise, NOT to
upgrade to Jaguar? What about ProjectBuilder?
Right after Jaguar came out I saw some testy
notes about things not working properly, but since then the list has
been relatively silent, which I take as a good sign that 1.3 works
at least as well under Jaguar as under 10.1.

Any advice would be appreciated!
--
Paul A. Heiney
Professor of Physics
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Pennsylvania | Tel: (215)-898-7918
209 South 33 Street | Fax: (215)-898-2010
Philadelphia, PA 19104 | email@hidden
http://dept.physics.upenn.edu/~heiney
_______________________________________________
java-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
Be sure to read the FAQ http://developer.apple.com/java/faq/ before posting
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.