| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
| Carlos, Evaluating performance on such small operations across physically distinct hardware and OSes is bound to bring errors. Generally if the meter is in milliseconds, additional apps running, memory size & cache can all have significant impact on performance in a transient manner. It may be better to build a test which runs that operation 1000 times & then compare the total numbers between each since any transient impact would likely be minimized. As to 1.6, it is still an early release from Apple & is more heavily optimized for Intel than PPC right now, so I would expect it's performance to be slower than both 1.5 & 1.4 especially on an iBook. Finally, the iBook is a laptop aimed at the lowend consumer market, whereas the P4 2.8GHZ is desktop aimed at a higher portion of the market. Thus the iBook should be slower than the P4. A better comparison would be made on a MacBook or iMac(Intel). There you can run Windows or OS X on the same hardware & directly compare the JVM performance rather than adding in hardware differences. Niels On Jul 17, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Carlos Santiago wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Java-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Java Performance in MAC OS X (From: "Carlos Santiago" <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Java Performance in MAC OS X (From: Bill Wagner <email@hidden>) | |
| >Re: Java Performance in MAC OS X (From: "Carlos Santiago" <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.