Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Java on Leopard report



On 10/26/07, Bill Janssen <email@hidden> wrote:
> I see little or no technical advantage in the use of Java 6 on
>  the Mac platform, barring bug fixes.  What in the world is in
> Java 6 that suddenly makes it so vital?

Google has started work on some collections, seen at code.google.com.
These currently extend Java 5, but by release will be targeted at Java
6 with Java 5 a backport branch.

I, personally, would like to play with this, and thus I want both a
Java 5 and a Java 6 VM available to work with, so I can insure that
any usages and changes do not bite me in unexpected ways.

To be clear, I do not need Java 6 this weekend.  I do want it in the
'weeks at most' timeframe if I am going to be able to use my mac to
play with this code.  Like Google Web Toolkit (currently on 1.4 and
working like demons to get to 1.5), it is nice to work with code that
is open source and available freely to all.

Scott
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Java-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/java-dev/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Java on Leopard report (From: "Tony Bigbee" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java on Leopard report (From: Yong Hyeon Yoon <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java on Leopard report (From: Scott Kovatch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java on Leopard report (From: Pratik Solanki <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java on Leopard report (From: "Tony Bigbee" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java on Leopard report (From: Pratik Solanki <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Java on Leopard report (From: Tim Goeke <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.