Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists
Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UFS vs HFS+

Just one,

THISFILE.DOC and thisfile.doc are the same. Just make sure that you don't have any files on your UFS that might overwrite each-other based upon the capital letters fiasco. In other words, HFS+ is not fully POSIX as its UFS cousin. I had to re-do my server because of this fact.

Ryan

On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 08:43 AM, Chris Prew wrote:

I am currently running a Web/FTP server and I have a separate HFS+ volume for the OS and another UFS volumes for the web data. I am considering switching the web data volume to HFS+ to take advantage of the journaling feature.

Are there any other benefits or disadvantages to consider regarding UFS vs HFS+?

My web data is secure -- various users require authentication to access various areas. There is currently about 50GB of data on the web data volume. I am running OS X Server 10.2.5, the Apple version of Apache, and Pure-FTPd. Hardware is an Xserve dual 1Ghz.

Any thoughts or feedback are appreciated.

Chris
_______________________________________________
macos-x-server mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macos-x-server
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
macos-x-server mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macos-x-server
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
References: 
 >UFS vs HFS+ (From: Chris Prew <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.