On 2007-10-08 Dave Schroeder wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:
>> Yeah. Only the claims Apple makes here don't mean anything at all,
>> because they don't become effective under German jurisdiction. This
>> matter is covered by ยงยง 305 ff. BGB (German civil law).
>
> People say the same thing about click-through and shrinkwrap
> agreements in the US.
>
> Many, many people view them as just as questionable, or even legally
> meaningless. (Or so they tell themselves; they may be right.)
>
>>> Now, if you're claiming that German law doesn't allow this
>>> prohibition, you can also make that argument in various ways in many
>>> other jurisdictions.
>>
>> I know only about the German laws covering this matter. Other
>> jurisdictions may or may not see things the same way, but I don't
>> know about that. That's why I wrote "at least".
>
> I'm simply telling that you many people believe as firmly as you do
> that Apple's claims are legally meaningless in their own
> jurisdictions.
Only that what I wrote doesn't have anything to do with belief, but with
what is written in the law. I even mentioned the respective sections. If
you understand German you can read them online:
http://bundesrecht.juris.de/bgb/BJNR001950896.html#BJNR001950896BJNG023401377
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files,
erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files."
--http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
