On 2007-10-08 Dave Schroeder wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:
>>> I'm simply telling that you many people believe as firmly as you do
>>> that Apple's claims are legally meaningless in their own
>>> jurisdictions.
>>
>> Only that what I wrote doesn't have anything to do with belief, but
>> with what is written in the law. I even mentioned the respective
>> sections. If you understand German you can read them online:
>>
>> http://bundesrecht.juris.de/bgb/BJNR001950896.html#BJNR001950896BJNG023401377
>
> If you think that any law in any nation is that absolute, I guess
> there are no reasons for lawyers and courts...
That's a non-sequitur. Besides, if you think a court could make (and
uphold) a judgement that is in clear and open contradiction of the law,
you are mistaken.
[...]
> Tell me: since it is technically possible to run Mac OS X on non-
> Apple hardware, you must have businesses in Germany that support and
> profit from this reality, given that German law is apparently so
> clear on the subject?
That's also a non-sequitur, and you know it.
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files,
erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files."
--http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macos-x-server mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
References:
>virtualization (From: Maximilian Sichart <email@hidden>)
