On 8/22/05, Marcel Weiher <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 22 Aug 2005, at 03:45, John Pfersich wrote:
>
> > As an aside, I find this all quite amusing because I'm, by preference,
> > a Smalltalker, and I'm always snickering when I see "Smalltalk based"
> > or "Smalltalk-like".There's a Smalltalk for the Mac being developed
> > over at www.ambrai.com, it has both Carbon and Cocoa "bindings".
>
> So far, I find Ambrai Smalltalk less than compelling, as it is yet
> another separate Smalltalk with only very loose connection to
> Objective-C and Cocoa. As such, I don't see much of a benefit over,
> say, Squeak or VisualWorks.
I was quite disappointed too, as it actually wants to use Carbon
instead of Cocoa for building gui apps, and as the programming tools
are rather poor at the moment. Using Squeak + WxSqueak is probably
better.. (the CocoaBridge could have been even better, closer to what
I'd like, but it has problems)
I'd like a really well integrated Smalltalk environment for
Cocoa/GNUstep though :-)
how is your Smalltalk integrated in the runtime going by the way ?
Cheers,
--
Nicolas Roard
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
-Arthur C. Clarke
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Objc-language mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/objc-language/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
