Re: Count bits

• Subject: Re: Count bits
• From: Ian Ollmann <email@hidden>
• Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:35:17 -0800
• Delivered-to: email@hidden
• Delivered-to: email@hidden

On Nov 28, 2005, at 8:12 AM, Holger Bettag wrote:

The vectorized version from Apple's pages is potentially the fastest, if
you can control the surrounding code and keep overhead low (moving data
between scalar and vector registers is expensive, because you have to go
through memory). Here are a few more scalar alternatives:

http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html

I was interested by this statement:

Can anyone name such a processor?

Ian
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
PerfOptimization-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/perfoptimization-dev/email@hidden

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Count bits
    • From: Holger Bettag <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: Count bits
• Next by Date: Re: Count bits
• Previous by thread: Re: Count bits
• Next by thread: Re: Count bits
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread