| |||
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Scott Ribe wrote:
A compression format based on a wavelet transform of the whole image ought to do significantly better than JPEG, because the images in question do not have large areas with texture. Wavelets typically remove much more redundancy from large uniform areas, while JPEG cannot look past the 8x8 pixel tiles that it transforms independently. The amount of ringing can be controlled by the type of wavelet used. But even the "standard" Daubechies filter pair with 9 and 7 taps (also called "4,4" refering to the number of "vanishing moments" in each filter) handles line art surprisingly well.PNG might be the right format. JPEG will have ringing artifacts with simple line art like that.
I'll look at PNG. I also plan to try TIFF + zlib, and even making an uncompressed TIFF then bzip'ing it. In some experiments, I got surprisingly good results with JPEG. I can't of course use a heavy degree of quantization, but I was surprised at how much compression I could get before artifacts started showing up. I think part of it is that with scanned images the edges are already slightly "softened" by the aliasing inherent in the sampling, as opposed to a computer-generated original where many edges may be absolute.
Holger _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. PerfOptimization-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/perfoptimization-dev/email@hidden
| References: | |
| >Re: Color reduction (From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>) |
| Home | Archives | FAQ | Terms/Conditions | Contact | RSS | Lists | About |
Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE
Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.