Mailing Lists: Apple Mailing Lists

Image of Mac OS face in stamp
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Quicktime effects, HD, and frame rate



Yuck, I was afraid something like that was going on (YRB->RGB, Oh My!).

Does anyone know of any lower-level hooks that would push a blend onto the video card?  OpenGL and pixel shaders, and that kind of
thing?

I see a Matrox DSX suite that looks promising, but I shudder to think what it costs.  For my app, specific hardware is OK, it's not
a mass-market project I'm building.

And for two simultaneous movies, I was running two instances of the Quicktime player (Windows, if that makes a difference).

Thanks, Bruce,
Chuck

   -----Original Message-----
   From: 
   quicktime-api-bounces+chuckb=email@hidden 
   [mailto:quicktime-api-bounces+chuckb=email@hidden.
   com] On Behalf Of Bruce Wheaton
   Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 6:56 PM
   To: QT-API
   Subject: Re: Quicktime effects, HD, and frame rate
   
   Play two of them? In what player? In Quicktime player, they 
   would be  
   running in a YUV colorspace, and being zapped right to the GPU and  
   converted to RGB as they're displayed (at no cost to the CPU).
   
   A sad fact of Quicktime Effects is that they're RGB only. So your  
   movies are going through a costly YRB > RGB conversion, then having  
   the effects applied, then the greater mass of RGB pixels is being  
   pushed to the GPU.
   
   Would that explain it?
   
   Bruce Wheaton
   
   On May 26, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chuck Bueche wrote:
   
   > Hi Folks,
   >
   > I've gotten my own effect up and running and am seeing a 
   really bad  
   > frame rate.  I started with the Dimmer2EffectWindows sample (and
   > eventually commented out *all* of the pixel-pushing in the  
   > EffectFilter* files).
   >
   > - My source media is 1264x720, 30 fps.
   > - On my system I can play two of these simultaneously with no  
   > apparent performance hit (roughly 10 mbits/sec).
   >
   > Even the simplest effect (even a complete NOP applied to only one  
   > source, for that matter) causes the frame rate to drop to 15 fps
   > or less.
   >
   > Is this simply due to moving a complete image around in 
   RAM, rather  
   > than changed pixels per frame?  Is there something I've missed
   > that would cause this?
   >
   > Thanks,
   > Chuck Bueche
   >
   >  _______________________________________________
   > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
   > QuickTime-API mailing list      (email@hidden)
   > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
   > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-api/bruce% 
   > 40spearmorgan.com
   >
   > This email sent to email@hidden
   
    _______________________________________________
   Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
   QuickTime-API mailing list      (email@hidden)
   Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
   http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-api/chuckb%4
   0craniac.com
   
   This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-API mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-api/email@hidden

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Quicktime effects, HD, and frame rate (From: Bruce Wheaton <email@hidden>)



Visit the Apple Store online or at retail locations.
1-800-MY-APPLE

Contact Apple | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.