[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: from fisheye to multirow stitching

Subject: Re: from fisheye to multirow stitching
From: Harald Walker <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:29:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030612

Santiago Ribas wrote:

I am discovering so many problems to solve fisheye based cubics that I question myself if it wasn't better to start using multirow stitching with RealViz, and my 17-35mm Nikon rectilinear lens (26-50 in D1).

I have no experience in multi-row stitching but I think it is a question of time (levelling, amount of images, post-processing time), money (needed software and equipment) and environment (travelling weight, are tripods possible/allowed).

Personally I like to keep it simple and therefore prefer the fisheye method and have invested into the Sigma 8mm lately to achieve a better quality.

Personally I like to keep it simple and therefore prefer the fisheye method and have invested into the Sigma 8mm lately to achieve a better quality. Once you have standardized your method (I haven't), the post-processing shouldnt take to much time and trouble.

As long as you only need it for the web, the quality of fisheye panoramas should be sufficient.

Regards,

Harald
_______________________________________________
quicktime-vr mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-vr
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References:
	>from fisheye to multirow stitching (From: Santiago Ribas <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: from fisheye to multirow stitching
Next by Date: thanks for testing help :)
Previous by thread: from fisheye to multirow stitching
Next by thread: Re: from fisheye to multirow stitching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home