Re: IPIX vs. Oxaal vs. IPIX

• Subject: Re: IPIX vs. Oxaal vs. IPIX
• From: Ken Turkowski <email@hidden>
• Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:22:51 -0700

http://pictosphere.com/kwx/news.html

I think this is the most interesting part:

In its defense, MEV has presented irrefutable evidence that there is no unfair competition and that the patent in suit (Re. 36,207) is invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed on numerous grounds, including: immunity from suit, anticipation (prior art), improper inventorship, inequitable conduct (including fraud in procurement), non-enablement, failure to disclose best mode, and inadequate written description, the result of which is expected to render the entire iPIX patent portfolio unenforceable.

_______________________________________________
quicktime-vr mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-vr
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: IPIX vs. Oxaal vs. IPIX
    • From: Danilo Jurisich <email@hidden>

• Prev by Date: Re: cubic hotspot names
• Next by Date: Orb scan by phone sent by TV is possible?
• Previous by thread: IPIX vs. Oxaal vs. IPIX
• Next by thread: Re: IPIX vs. Oxaal vs. IPIX
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread