I am still trying to get my head around this. I rarely need to produce
a pano movie file that is very large. On average, the movie dimensions
are 320x200 px. to approximate the proportions of a horizontal 35mm
frame. I just like the 3:2 proportion very much. I am wanting to
standardize my workflow method to begin to ensure some predicability in
the output of the .mov files and the .pict files. Some of my files go
back to 1999 and I am trying to determine why I made the choices I did
in getting the output files to be a certain size, and because I'ev
never established a workflow, I am still in a grey area about what
effects the finally output sizes.
I recently went back to make thumbnails of all my panos again because I
am changing the look of my web site for the panos. I am looking at two
different .mov files whose file size is identical at 364 kb. The .pict
files dimensions and sizes are quite different however. I can go into
explicit detail of the dimensions of the source images if I need to but
before having to do that, for simplicity sake; I want to ask about the
relationship between, pixel dimensions vs. dpi on the final product.
1. Does the dpi setting have any effect on the .pict
2. Or, does the pixel dimension alone determine the output of the .pict
file?
3. Which of these factors, (dpi vs. pixel dimension) is the greater
determinant in the .mov file size?
Cylindrical panos only...
--
John Lee
Apple Certified Technician
208.368.0054
http://myweb.cableone.net/stellar808/
.::. Before you choose a counselor, watch him with his neighbor's
children .::.
(Sioux)
_______________________________________________
quicktime-vr mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/quicktime-vr
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.