I wrote a reply last week telling about my panos with 50mm lens using 24
shots. I made an error - actual final size is 3000 x 40000 - not 2000 x
40000 as earlier stated.
That said, I do not have trouble stitching panos of this size with QTVRAS
1.0.1. I have a G4 with 2 gigs of RAM and I am running OS X and running
QTVRAS in Classic mode. I align my images manually by habit. I never even
try the auto alignment anymore. Maybe that is why it works for me?
I am going to be using PTGUI for my new projects, but I have not started
with that phase of production yet.
Paul Fretheim
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:03:00 -0300
From: - AYRTON VR - <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: Dimension X Resolution :: keeping on
To: QTVR list <email@hidden>
Message-ID: <email@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/08/2006, at 15:47, Hans Nyberg wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2006, at 8:26 PM, - AYRTON VR - wrote:
>> Oppps.
>> I do have one friend who has the S2 Pro
>> and another friend who has the 16mm fisheye Nikkor
>> Do you think it would be a better choice than the 8mm on a D200 ???
>> I need to make a CYLINDRICAL image to be printed in a big plotter !!!
>
> Depends on what vertical FOV you need
> With the S2 Pro you will only get 86 degrees
> If that is enough you will get around 12.000 pixels wide panorama
> You could also use the 16mm on the 14N and get about the same size but
> with a FOV of 138 degrees.
> Hans
Ok guys, first of all THANKS a lot to all who replied to me.
It's a lot of people ... Hans, Rodolpho, Carl, Landis, Robert, Roger,
Andrew, Paul, etc...
Anyway here we go in the next move I did and how I'm in more trouble
yet :-)
My Client wants to make a big plotter from a 360º. It will be 7,5 X 1,5
meters printed w/ 72 dpi
That means more or less a 21.000 pixels wide image.
I shot 12 clicks (at 30º) with the D200 using a Nikkor 16mm fullframe
fisheye, f:11 at 1/125 ISO 100 NEF (3872 X 2592)
Now I'm getting trouble because I can not make anything good enough.
If I'm using PTMAC I can not figure out which LENS parameters to add to
my database and it just does NOT make a good stich (I'm not even saying
"perfect"). How does Hans calculate this would be a 86 degrees ???
Using my old PHOTOVISTA 1.0.1 it shows me a perfect "preview", but...
after the full stich finishes, it does save a corrupted pano image
completely brown !?!?! with just 1,2mb but with around 16.000 ...
And using my old QTVRAS 1.0.1 it does NOT make the stich! It shows me
on the window-box just strange coloured lines all over during blending.
I also tried shoot with a S2 Pro w/same lens, and I'm having the SAME
problem as above
AND I also shot using the D70, which if I use PHOTOVISTA, makes a
perfect blend and a nice pano, BUT too small size for what I need now
...
And if I try to make bare-hands with PhotoMerge at PS CS2, I can not
get a perfect 360º, besides it's taking me forever to retouch every
little detail ...
HELP !!! HELP, HELP !
Any ideas ???
THANKS in advance.
BTW: I'm using a
MAC G4
500 mhz
1.5 RAM
OS X 10.3.9
QT 7.1
PTMAC 4.1
PS CS2
Thanks again
AYRTON
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-VR mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-vr/email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
