Re: jpg compression

Subject: Re: jpg compression

From: Hans Nyberg <email@hidden>

Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:54:46 +0100

Delivered-to: email@hidden

On Jan 12, 2008, at 12:56 PM, JHS wrote:

enblend runs far faster than both - especially v3 (about 3x faster than SmartBlend external). The output on average for both appears the same in my experiments. I haven't encountered the apex (zenith) "radar sweep" problem with blue skies with enblend using a D70 with 10.5mm Nikkor.

Of course not. You do not need to blend the zenith with a zenith image at +90.

You only get it with a full circle image with no zenith shot. My pano was a 4 image on 5D with a shaved 10,5mm

I have also version 3.1 for testing right now and there is no change.

A screen shot here from a QTVR using Stitcher v5.5 & enblend v1.3 (I think the source QTVR would be too big for many, over 17MB):

http://web.mac..com/wdd3/iWeb/Trial/enblendSky.html

Remember that the 1.3 enblend has serious color shift/banding problems if you use 8bit.

It does not look like normal banding, I used to call it "dirty banding"

Hans

Hans Nyberg

Panoramas.dk<http://www.panoramas.dk> Features Fullscreen QTVR from the best VR Photographers

email: email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. QuickTime-VR mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-vr/email@hidden This email sent to email@hidden

References:

>Re: jpg compression (From: JHS <email@hidden>)